P.R.O.s continue policy of suing bars and Restaurants. Are your licenses in place?
By Gordon Firemark | July 2, 2009
As I blogged here last December, Performance Rights Organizations like ASCAP and BMI continue their policy of pursuing legal action against bars and restaurants that play music without proper licensing. The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog has a piece today, that reminds us of the policy. 
Earlier this week, BMI filed a suit against a restaurant called “Pianos” where the song “Talk Dirty To Me” by the band Poison (among other songs) proved a toxic brew. The suit filed by BMI and a number of copyright holders seeks an injunction, attorneys fees, and statutory damages, which can amount to as much as $150,000 per infringement.
The bottom line is this: If you’re operating a bar or restaurant, larger than 3750 square feet, and/or playing music through a system of more than 6 loudspeakers, you need licenses from these Performing Rights Organizations, or you could find yourself on the receiving end of one of these lawsuits.
If you’re a bar or restaurant owner and you don’t already have your license(s)., you may wish to consult your entertainment lawyer, to determine what’s required. Of course if you’re contacted by one of these organizations, consult your attorney right away… BEFORE you respond.
Topics: Intellectual property, Music
| No Comments »
Copyright Registration and other fees increase August 1st
By Gordon Firemark | July 2, 2009
Everybody knows that copyright registration is important, and that doing so in a timely fashion can provide a copyright owner a greater award in an infringement suit.
With the current backlog of registrations in the Copyright office, it’s especially important to get your works into the que for registration as soon as possible. The agency processes applications on a first-in, first-out basis.
Here, however, is yet another good reason to file your copyright registration now. It’ll save you money. According to this report on the U.S. Copyright Office Website, On August 1st, many copyright office fees will increase.
Copyright registration is relatively simple, but you may need help from an experienced entertainment- or intellectual property attorney for more complex applications, such as those involving multiple works registered as a ‘folio’, or for musical compositions embodied in recordings (essentially two different works).
Even after the fee increases, copyright registration is still one of the most affordable ways an artist or author can protect herself against the losses that can be suffered from unauthorized copying of her work.
Now’s the time folks. Call me if you need advice about copyright registration or any other intellectual property protection issue.
Topics: Entertainment law, Intellectual property
| No Comments »
Talent Agent’s chilling “State of the Industry” message sends shivers through Hollywood.
By Gordon Firemark | June 30, 2009
Talent agent James J. Jones of Premiere Talent, issued a gloomy “State of the Industry” message last March, which has been circulating around town among established actors and hopefuls alike.
The message paints a bleak picture for an industry following two major labor disturbances in the past two years, and suggests that work for actors is less plentiful than ever before, with film actors taking the few television starring jobs available, and top-tier TV actors taking co-star, guest star and less prestigious roles.
What that leaves for aspiring actors, and the thousands of established actors who’ve worked only occasionally Jones warns, is even fewer opportunities.
Sadly, this situation “trickles down” to all entertainment industry workers, including writers, directors, crew, and even professionals like accountants, lawyers and the like.
The glimmer of good news is that this presents terrific opportunities for independent filmmakers, provided they’ve got courageous investors on board. Today’s indie has a better-than-ever chance of getting name talent to work for affordable fees, given a good script and an attractive role.
In my view, if our industry is to rebound from the WGA strike, the SAG almost-strike, and the troubled economy, we’ll all need to tighten our belts a bit… but the time jump into new production. Let’s get folks back to work!
Topics: Entertainment law
| No Comments »
Reflections on the fate of the music business as we know it.
By Gordon Firemark | June 11, 2009
A panel I attended recently at the Recording Academy addressed digital music, particularly the problems songwriters (and record labels, artists, etc.) have getting paid for their music, particularly in the face of file-sharers obtaining copies for free.
A vocal majority on the panel, and in the audience seemed to take the position that the only solution is to require Internet Service Providers to charge their users a monthly digital media consumption fee of some sort. This, it seems, part of the idea behind CHORUSS, a pilot program at a few universities, which requires students to opt-in by paying a monthly fee, that the University will then pass along to content owners.
For me, this solution is plagued with problems. First, in all likelihood, if implemented on a broad scale, it will be an automatic charge we all pay. Those who never file-share or download media content will be subsidizing the users who DO download, especially those who take more than their fair share. Second, this looks to the wrong party for payment. Isn’t asking ISPs to pay music royalties when songs pass through their networks similar to asking UPS to pay book authors’ royalties when they deliver books bought via Amazon.com?
Now, of course no solution to this problem is perfect, but it’s my sincere hope that the content community and the tech communities can find a better solution. Unfortunately, other solutions discussed involved asking ISPs to log every bit of data passing through every user’s IP address… which raises tremendous privacy concerns.
One interesting view was that espoused by a manager/consultant on the panel who seemed to suggest that we just need to accept that file-sharing is here, and that many (but not all) consumers are getting (music) for free… so we’d better find something else to sell them. (Sounds like a ‘loss-leader’ approach). ‘Give away the recordings of your songs… develop a fan base, then sell ‘em concert tickets and T-shirts’… seemed to be his notion.
Clearly, there’s no good solution, but the prevailing view of the panel is that something must be done. If artists such as songwriters can no longer receive fair compensation for their efforts.. they’ll find something else to do… and society will be the worse for it.
Topics: Entertainment law
| No Comments »
Entertainment Law Update Podcast – Episode 2
By Gordon Firemark | June 3, 2009
Entertainment Law Update Podcast
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Episode 2 of the Entertainment Law Update Podcast, hosted by yours truly, along with Tamera Bennett is now online .
In this episode, Tamera and I round up the latest entertainment law news, including:
- Beverly Hills Bar Association’s Entertainment Lawyer of the Year
- Pres. Obama’s nominee for Supreme Court
- Copyright Office Backlogs
- Constitutional issues with the Register of Copyrights
- Sports Leagues losing ground against Fantasy Sports purveyors
- Brainard v. Vassar’s useful discussion of “Access” in copyright infringement analysis
- Warner Music’s DMCA Takedown of Lawrence Lessig video
- Woody Allen and American Apparel settle right of publicity case
- Steinbeck heirs lose bid for Supreme Court review
- SAG settles claims arising from 2007-08 WGA strike
- Tanenbaum’s fair use argument in RIAA case.
CLE Credit for attorneys who listen to the podcast is pending approval in California and Texas. Attorneys from other states should check the rules for out-of-state programs. We’ll add more States as demand arises.
Topics: Entertainment law
| No Comments »
Speaking at LA County Bar Association
By Gordon Firemark | May 28, 2009
I’m pleased to have been asked to join an impressive panel of lawyers, including internet defamation attorney Adrianos Fachetti; class action attorney H. Scott Leviant; Barger & Wolen Marketing Director Heather Milligan, and mediator attorney Victoria Pynchon, to discuss how lawyers can use and benefit from social media.
The Details:
Los Angeles County Bar Association’s Second Annual Small Firm and Solo Practitioner Conference, June 24-25.
Social Networking For Lawyers: A Roadmap to Success
Thursday, June 25. 9:15 – 10:30 a.m.
In this interactive session we will explore the buzz surrounding social networking and social media tools and how solo and small firms practitioners can effectively employ them to communicate with current clients; control your messaging as you reach out to new clients and the media; and to meet, network and collaborate with colleagues.
Our panel of solo and small firm attorneys will discuss their experiences with blogging as a social media tool, and we will spotlight several social networking applications, including Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn. By calling upon their personal experiences, our panel will highlight best practices for how you can incorporate these and other Web 2.0 applications into your business development, PR and networking activities.
You don’t want to miss this event!
Topics: Events, General Information
| No Comments »
Will Judge Sotomayor be good for the entertainment industry?
By Gordon Firemark | May 26, 2009
President Obama today named Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his nominee for the Supreme Court seat to be vacated by Justice David Souter upon his retirement at the end of the current term.
Ben Sheffner of the Copyrights and Campaigns blog points out that before her appointment to the Federal Bench by then President George H.W. Bush, Sotomayor worked as a litigator for boutique New York law firm Pavia & Harcourt, where she focused on intellectual property and international matters for the firm’s corporate clients, including rights owners.
Does this indicate that big-media can expect a friend in Justice Sotomayor, if she’s confirmed? Time will tell.
Meanwhile, we can all ruminate over this list of her opinions as a Judge, compiled by the New York Times
Topics: Entertainment law
| No Comments »
Copyright Registration System under fire – part 2
By Gordon Firemark | May 22, 2009
In part I of this series, I discussed the current backlog on registrations at the copyright office. Here, I discuss a more fundamental issue which questions the very validity of every copyright registration.
Questions about the validity of U.S. Copyright Registrations may require dismissal of every copyright suit!?
In most U.S. District Courts, copyright registration is a requirement before a plaintiff can file an infringement suit. Recently, however, some legal commentators have raised a terrifying spectre that could (arguably) result in the dismissal of every copyright infringement action filed.
Under the Constitution’s “appointments clause”, only the President, Courts or a cabinet level department head can appoint the “inferior officers” of the goverment. Trouble is, the Register of Copyrights , such an officer, is appointed by the Librarian of Congress. (Not a cabinet-level appointee) (Cabinet level appointees are carefully vetted and ultimately confirmed by the Senate, etc.).
So, it seems, at least to some, that the appointments made by the Librarian of Congress are invalid because they violate the appointments clause of the constitution. This argument is currently before the courts in a major battle challenging the appointment of the Copyright Royalty Board (also by the Librarian of Congress)
If the Register of Copyrights holds the office in violation of the constitution, then all of her ministerial acts (such as registration of millions of copyrights each year), are invalid, and since valid registration is a jurisdictional requirement for the Courts to hear copyright cases, such cases must therefore be dismissed.
Wow.
The Courts will soon rule on the Copyright Royalty Board case, which may provide more answers… or more questions.
Hat Tip to Shourin Sen of the Exclusive Rights blog, and Ben Sheffner at Copyrights & Campaigns
Topics: Entertainment law
| No Comments »
Copyright Registration System under fire – Part 1
By Gordon Firemark | May 21, 2009
Entertainment Lawyers are always quick to advise their clients to register copyrights in their work. Today, however, a couple of issues have arisen that make me wonder if the current US Copyright registration system isn’t in trouble.
Major Backlog at the Copyright Office raises questions about the whole system.
First, the Washington Post reports that since the new Electronic Copyright Office registration system was launched, new copyright registrations are bogged down, with turnaround time for registration taking as long as 18 months, in some cases. Reportedly, Copyright Office workers blame the productivity slowdown on glitches with the new system, which cost $52 Million to implement. Meanwhile, managers at the Library of Congress (the parent agency of the copyright office) blame the slowdown on training issues, and staff resistance to the new system.
The new system was implemented in mid 2008, and the old paper-based system is being dismantled, but paper-based applications still represent nearly half of all registrations being submitted. The trouble is, the paper is just piling up, with copyright office staff having difficulty finding time to do the manual data entry required for paper forms.
What does this mean for new copyright registrants? According to one office official, the current backlog threatens the very intgrity of the copyright system in the U.S. So, don’t hold your breath waiting for a certificate.
The copyright office receives approximately 10,000 new registration applications each week.
hat tip to Tamera Bennett at the CreateProtect.c0m
in part 2 of this series, I discuss the disturbing constitutional questions about how the Register of Copyrights is appointed, and whether her acts (registering copyrights) are invalid… leaving authors without the full protection of copyright law.
Topics: Entertainment law
| No Comments »
« Previous Entries