• Welcome

    Gordon Firemark headshot
    The Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark are entertainment attorneys dedicated to the legal and business affairs needs of clients in the entertainment and media industries. By offering those kinds of legal and business affairs services handled in-house at the larger studios, production companies, talent agencies and record labels, we help small and mid-sized entertainment businesses, individual producers, writers and artists to reliably and efficiently out-source their legal and business affairs work.
  • SUBSCRIBE

    To receieve email updates when new material is added to this page
    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    Subscribe in a reader

  • Recommended Reading


  • Del.icio.us

  • RSS TheatreMania

  • Archives

  • Meta

  • « Apples and Apples: Computer Giant prevails in case brought by Beatles’ record label | Main | Judge Rules “sanitizing” films is copyright infringement »

    ‘Bloggers are Journalists’ says Court of Appeals

    By Gordon Firemark | May 30, 2006

    Win some, lose some. Apple computer lost its appeal in a case involving a blog’s early disclosure of the company’s upcoming new products.

    Last year, following a number of incidents, Apple sued a ‘rumor site’ which had broken several stories about forthcoming Apple products. Apple argued that the site was violating the company’s trade secrets, and the lower court agreed, overruling the site owners’ argument that their publication of the stories was protected under the first amendment as journalism.

    The California Court of Appeals, however has ruled in the bloggers’ favor, stating that web publications are covered under the same first amendment protections as offline publications.

    The court refused to get into a lengthy discussion of whether journalism is ‘legitimate’. The so-called ‘reporter’s shield law’ is designed to protect the gathering and dissemination of news… which is exactly what the web-site did.

    Topics: Entertainment law, First Amendment
    Print this Post

    Comments