<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRS eliminates tax breaks for some independent films</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firemark.com/2007/02/20/irs-eliminates-tax-breaks-for-some-independent-films/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firemark.com/2007/02/20/irs-eliminates-tax-breaks-for-some-independent-films/</link>
	<description>Theatre, Film, Television, Music &#38; New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:22:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Firemark</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2007/02/20/irs-eliminates-tax-breaks-for-some-independent-films/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/wp/?p=6#comment-4</guid>
		<description>UPDATE:

I&#039;ve now had occasion to research this, and it appears that congress DID act to extend the legislation to cover films which begin production before January 1, 2010.  The extension also applies to the FIRST $15 Million of ANY qualifying production, not just to films UNDER $15 Million.

Good news for keeping films here in the U.S. during these troubled economic times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve now had occasion to research this, and it appears that congress DID act to extend the legislation to cover films which begin production before January 1, 2010.  The extension also applies to the FIRST $15 Million of ANY qualifying production, not just to films UNDER $15 Million.</p>
<p>Good news for keeping films here in the U.S. during these troubled economic times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Firemark</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2007/02/20/irs-eliminates-tax-breaks-for-some-independent-films/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/wp/?p=6#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t heard that, nor have I researched the question.

Best advice is consult a lawyer about this before relying on any purported tax break</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard that, nor have I researched the question.</p>
<p>Best advice is consult a lawyer about this before relying on any purported tax break</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Cavestani</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2007/02/20/irs-eliminates-tax-breaks-for-some-independent-films/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Cavestani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/wp/?p=6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Is this IRS regulation in effect? I heard that during the recent Bail Out legislation it was reinstated so that once again you can get the 15 million write off.  Is that true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this IRS regulation in effect? I heard that during the recent Bail Out legislation it was reinstated so that once again you can get the 15 million write off.  Is that true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
