<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrity likenesses revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/</link>
	<description>Theatre, Film, TV &#38; New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 02:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Firemark</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I, too read the quoted provision as excluding original works of fine art, however the Astaire Act is not the only applicable law, and only applies in California.  

CMG, I think, would have had viable claims.  Just not under the Astaire Act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too read the quoted provision as excluding original works of fine art, however the Astaire Act is not the only applicable law, and only applies in California.  </p>
<p>CMG, I think, would have had viable claims.  Just not under the Astaire Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ferrigno</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ferrigno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>I also have a question about intellectual property rights.
I was reading about Civil Code section 3344.1, known as the &quot;Astaire Celebrity Image Protection Act,&quot; 

A wikipedia article states:

&quot;Among the uses exempt from the Astaire act:
&#039;a play, book, magazine, newspaper, musical composition, audiovisual work, radio or television program, single and original work of art, work of political or newsworthy value, or an advertisement or commercial announcement for any of these works, shall not be considered a product, article of merchandise, good, or service if it is fictional or nonfictional entertainment, or a dramatic, literary, or musical work. &#039; &quot;

This sounds to me like an original work of fine art is exempt from this law.
Is this correct? 

I am an artist who was almost sued by CMG enteratainment for using a celbrity likeness, and I would like to know if they would have had a real case against me.

Thanks to anyone who can help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have a question about intellectual property rights.<br />
I was reading about Civil Code section 3344.1, known as the &#8220;Astaire Celebrity Image Protection Act,&#8221; </p>
<p>A wikipedia article states:</p>
<p>&#8220;Among the uses exempt from the Astaire act:<br />
&#8216;a play, book, magazine, newspaper, musical composition, audiovisual work, radio or television program, single and original work of art, work of political or newsworthy value, or an advertisement or commercial announcement for any of these works, shall not be considered a product, article of merchandise, good, or service if it is fictional or nonfictional entertainment, or a dramatic, literary, or musical work. &#8216; &#8221;</p>
<p>This sounds to me like an original work of fine art is exempt from this law.<br />
Is this correct? </p>
<p>I am an artist who was almost sued by CMG enteratainment for using a celbrity likeness, and I would like to know if they would have had a real case against me.</p>
<p>Thanks to anyone who can help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Firemark</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>There are some companies that are in the business of licensing celebrity likenesses, etc., but there&#039;s no one-stop shopping.  It IS necessary to track down the proper representative for each person involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some companies that are in the business of licensing celebrity likenesses, etc., but there&#8217;s no one-stop shopping.  It IS necessary to track down the proper representative for each person involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mossman</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Mossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to obtain a permission to use a likeness via a clearing house, like Harry Fox for publishign rights? Or is it necessary to track down an attorney for each estate? Eg. an animated film using celebrity characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to obtain a permission to use a likeness via a clearing house, like Harry Fox for publishign rights? Or is it necessary to track down an attorney for each estate? Eg. an animated film using celebrity characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Firemark</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/comment-page-/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Yes... the celeb could sue!  In most jurisdictions, a Celebrity (and in many cases, any person, whether a star or not) has a property right in his or her likeness, and may prevent any unauthorized commercial use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230; the celeb could sue!  In most jurisdictions, a Celebrity (and in many cases, any person, whether a star or not) has a property right in his or her likeness, and may prevent any unauthorized commercial use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/2007/10/29/celebrity-likenesses-revisited/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I have a question.

If I draw a star in all original setting as a political and religious statement and attain interested buyers,,

If I make copies and sell it, does the star have the right to sue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question.</p>
<p>If I draw a star in all original setting as a political and religious statement and attain interested buyers,,</p>
<p>If I make copies and sell it, does the star have the right to sue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 27/40 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 585/591 objects using disk: basic

Served from: firemark.com @ 2012-05-17 08:15:20 -->
