<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backlog at the Copyright office grows to two (2) years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firemark.com/2010/03/08/backlog-at-the-copyright-office-grows-to-two-2-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firemark.com/2010/03/08/backlog-at-the-copyright-office-grows-to-two-2-years/</link>
	<description>Theatre, Film, Television, Music &#38; New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Firemark</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2010/03/08/backlog-at-the-copyright-office-grows-to-two-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=1132#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Yes, most Courts will accept a proof of mailing or affidavit tat the registration has been filed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, most Courts will accept a proof of mailing or affidavit tat the registration has been filed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Pinkus</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2010/03/08/backlog-at-the-copyright-office-grows-to-two-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Pinkus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=1132#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Hi Gordon,

I was curious about this so I called the copyright office early this morning. 

It is true, the backlog is up to two years for printed submissions.

For internet submissions they told me it is 6 to 8 months.

Thanks,
Bob Pinkus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gordon,</p>
<p>I was curious about this so I called the copyright office early this morning. </p>
<p>It is true, the backlog is up to two years for printed submissions.</p>
<p>For internet submissions they told me it is 6 to 8 months.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Bob Pinkus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Brown</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2010/03/08/backlog-at-the-copyright-office-grows-to-two-2-years/comment-page-1/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=1132#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Despite that backlog, the way I understand from reading elsewhere, your copyright will be dated and be effective from the date the application is received at the Office.
 
So, if during that two year wait a plagiarism case arises before you receive the approved copyright will your application copy, on its own, be sufficient as proof, or would you have to again petition the Office to provide the actual proof?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite that backlog, the way I understand from reading elsewhere, your copyright will be dated and be effective from the date the application is received at the Office.</p>
<p>So, if during that two year wait a plagiarism case arises before you receive the approved copyright will your application copy, on its own, be sufficient as proof, or would you have to again petition the Office to provide the actual proof?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
