<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Law Offices of Gordon P. FiremarkPodcasting | Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark | Entertainment Attorneys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firemark.com/category/podcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firemark.com</link>
	<description>Theatre, Film, TV &#38; New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Theatre, Film, TV &amp; New Media</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://firemark.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Theatre, Film, TV &amp; New Media</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>.TV interview with Mark Yoshimoto Nemcoff:  Fair Use, Parody and the Web.</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2011/12/13/tv-interview-mark-yoshimoto-nemcoff-fair-use-parody-web/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2011/12/13/tv-interview-mark-yoshimoto-nemcoff-fair-use-parody-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=2514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, at the BlogWorld 2011 conference, I gave an interview to my good friend Mark Yoshimoto Nemcoff of .TV. We discussed the Fair Use defense to copyright infringement. &#160; The angles aren&#8217;t particularly flattering, but here&#8217;s the video:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, at the BlogWorld 2011 conference, I gave an interview to my good friend <a class="zem_slink" title="Pacific Coast Hellway" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Coast_Hellway" rel="wikipedia">Mark Yoshimoto Nemcoff</a> of .<a class="zem_slink" title="Television" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television" rel="wikipedia">TV</a>. We discussed the <a class="zem_slink" title="Fair use" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use" rel="wikipedia">Fair Use</a> defense to <a class="zem_slink" title="Copyright infringement" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement" rel="wikipedia">copyright infringement</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The angles aren&#8217;t particularly flattering, but here&#8217;s the video:</p>
<p><object width="640" height="360" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ocA75A97qLM?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="640" height="360" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ocA75A97qLM?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=f20a90db-1b87-48f3-8705-79bd2746070f" alt="" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2011/12/13/tv-interview-mark-yoshimoto-nemcoff-fair-use-parody-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Producers Survival Guide now available in more formats!</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2010/12/30/media-producers-survival-guide-now-available-more-formats/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2010/12/30/media-producers-survival-guide-now-available-more-formats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=1719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m very pleased to announce that my ebook, The Podcast, Blog &#38; New Media Producer&#8217;s Legal Survival Guide is now available for Amazon&#8217;s Kindle reader and Apple&#8217;s iPad, as well as in .pdf format. The Guide is the first comprehensive ebook that  gives a clear, concise and layperson friendly explanation of the legal principles, issues...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://firemark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/survival-guide.png"></a><a href="http://podcastlawbook.com"><img class="alignright" title="survival guide" src="http://firemark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/survival-guide.png" alt="" width="360" height="360" /></a>I&#8217;m very pleased to announce that my ebook, <a href="http://podcastlawbook.com" target="_blank">The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producer&#8217;s Legal Survival Guide</a> is now available for <a style="border: none;" href="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002Y27P3M?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=lawoffofgorpf-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002Y27P3M&quot;&gt;Kindle Wireless Reading Device, Wi-Fi, Graphite, 6&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src=" target="_blank">Amazon&#8217;s Kindle reader </a>and <a style="border: none;" href="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002C7481G?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=lawoffofgorpf-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002C7481G&quot;&gt;Apple iPad MB292LL/A Tablet (16GB, Wifi)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src=" target="_blank">Apple&#8217;s iPad</a>, as well as in .pdf format.</p>
<div>
<p>The Guide is the first comprehensive ebook that  gives a clear, concise and layperson friendly explanation of the legal principles, issues and claims that can arise for producers of internet-based media.</p>
<p>The guide is designed to help those who write blogs, host &amp; produce <a class="zem_slink" title="Podcast" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast">podcasts</a>, or distribute video or other media via the Internet avoid the most common mistakes that lead to threats, recriminations and lawsuits.</p>
<p>Also included are several free bonus reports, sample letters and checklists!</p>
<p>Forewarned is forearmed. The information in The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producers’ Legal Survival Guide can save you tens- or hundreds- of thousands of dollars in legal fees, months or even years of litigation, and countless sleepless nights.</p>
<p><strong>Don’t Wait! GET this e-book right now, and </strong><strong>Learn what you need to know to stay out of legal trouble with your podcast, blog or new media content.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Purchase online at <a href="http://podcastlawbook.com">http://podcastlawbook.com</a></strong></p>
</div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=fa0a0945-9878-4f77-aaba-193d31b8378c" alt="" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2010/12/30/media-producers-survival-guide-now-available-more-formats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My appearance on &#8220;The Podcasters Studio&#8221; &#8216;Podcasting and the Law&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2010/11/19/my-appearance-on-podcasters-studio/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2010/11/19/my-appearance-on-podcasters-studio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=1520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, I was interviewed for  Episode 38 of &#8220;The Podcasters Studio&#8221;, a podcast about podcasting technique, technology and philosophy.   That show&#8217;s host, Ray, was kind enough to let me plug my podcast, Entertainment Law Update, and my ebook, The Podcast, Blog and New Media Producer’s Legal Survival Guide. Listen to the interview here:   We...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Podcasters Studio logo" src="http://thepodcastersstudio.com/wp-content/themes/thesis_151/lib/scripts/thumb.php?src=http://thepodcastersstudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/TPSID3image150x150-e1293640576538.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="survival-guide-300x300" src="http://thepodcastersstudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/survival-guide-300x300-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>Earlier this week, I was interviewed for  <a href="http://http://thepodcastersstudio.com/tps-ep-38-podcasting-and-the-law-an-interview-with-entertainment-attorney-gordon-firemark/" target="_blank">Episode 38 of &#8220;The Podcasters Studio&#8221;</a>, a podcast about podcasting technique, technology and philosophy.   That show&#8217;s host, Ray, was kind enough to let me plug my podcast, <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com" target="_blank">Entertainment Law Update</a>, and my ebook, <a href="http://www.podcastlawbook.com/">The Podcast, Blog and New Media Producer’s Legal Survival Guide</a>.</p>
<p>Listen to the interview here:  </p>
<p>We talk about the many different legal issues surrounding podcasting and podcasters including copyright, fair use, model releases and much more. Do you know your rights if your original content is taken and used without your permission or violates the copyright you have in place? What can you do to make sure you are getting proper credit for your content? In our discussion, I offer some advice about how to approach such situations from both a formal (drop some legal forms on ‘em) and informal (ask nicely) perspective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2010/11/19/my-appearance-on-podcasters-studio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/thepodcastersstudio/TPS_Ep._38_-_Podcasting_and_the_Law_-_An_Interview_with_Entertainment_Attorney_Gordon_Firemark.mp3" length="59544590" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Earlier this week, I was interviewed for  Episode 38 of &quot;The Podcasters Studio&quot;, a podcast about podcasting technique, technology and philosophy.   That show&#039;s host, Ray, was kind enough to let me plug my podcast, Entertainment Law Update, and my ebook,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Earlier this week, I was interviewed for  Episode 38 of &quot;The Podcasters Studio&quot;, a podcast about podcasting technique, technology and philosophy.   That show&#039;s host, Ray, was kind enough to let me plug my podcast, Entertainment Law Update, and my ebook, The Podcast, Blog and New Media Producer’s Legal Survival Guide.

Listen to the interview here:  

We talk about the many different legal issues surrounding podcasting and podcasters including copyright, fair use, model releases and much more. Do you know your rights if your original content is taken and used without your permission or violates the copyright you have in place? What can you do to make sure you are getting proper credit for your content? In our discussion, I offer some advice about how to approach such situations from both a formal (drop some legal forms on ‘em) and informal (ask nicely) perspective</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:01:52</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producer&#8217;s Legal Survival Guide</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2010/10/26/ebook/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2010/10/26/ebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=1468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My ebook, The Podcast, Blog &#38; New Media Producer&#8217;s Legal Survival Guide is now available for sale. The Guide is the first comprehensive ebook that  gives a clear, concise and layman friendly explanation of the legal principles, issues and claims that can arise for producers of internet-based media. Written by veteran entertainment and media lawyer,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://firemark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/survival-guide.png"></a><a href="http://podcastlawbook.com"><img class="alignright" title="survival guide" src="http://firemark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/survival-guide.png" alt="" width="360" height="360" /></a>My ebook, <a href="http://podcastlawbook.com" target="_blank">The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producer&#8217;s Legal Survival Guide</a> is now available for sale.</p>
<div>
<p>The Guide is the first comprehensive ebook that  gives a clear, concise and layman friendly explanation of the legal principles, issues and claims that can arise for producers of internet-based media.</p>
<p>Written by veteran entertainment and media lawyer, Gordon Firemark, this guide is designed to help those who write blogs, host &amp; produce podcasts, or distribute video or other media via the Internet avoid the most common mistakes that lead to threats, recriminations and lawsuits.</p>
<p>Also included are several free bonus reports, sample letters and checklists!</p>
<p>Forewarned is forearmed. The information in The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producers’ Legal Survival Guide can save you tens- or hundreds- of thousands of dollars in legal fees, months or even years of litigation, and countless sleepless nights.</p>
<p><strong>Don’t Wait! GET this e-book right now, and </strong><strong>Learn what you need to know to stay out of legal trouble with your podcast, blog or new media content.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Purchase online at <a href="http://podcastlawbook.com">http://podcastlawbook.com</a></strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2010/10/26/ebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Soon:  My Podcast Law and Theatre Law (e)Books!</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2010/10/02/coming-soon-my-books/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2010/10/02/coming-soon-my-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am very pleased to announce the forthcoming release of two books I&#8217;ve written. The Podcast, Blog &#38; New Media Producer&#8217;s Legal Survival Guide The Podcast, Blog &#38; New Media Producer&#8217;s Legal Field Guide will be released and launched at the Blogworld New Media Expo in Las Vegas on October 15th, 2010. This book, (first available...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very pleased to announce the forthcoming release of two books I&#8217;ve written.</p>
<h2><a href="http://podcastlawbook.com">The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producer&#8217;s Legal Survival Guide</a></h2>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-1447 aligncenter" title="survival guide" src="http://firemark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/survival-guide.png" alt="" width="360" height="360" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The Podcast, Blog &amp; New Media Producer&#8217;s Legal Field Guide will be released and launched at the <a href="http://blogworldexpo.com" target="_blank">Blogworld New Me</a><a href="http://blogworldexpo.com" target="_blank">dia Expo</a> in Las Vegas on <strong>October 15th, 2010.</strong></p>
<p>This book, (first available as an e-book in .pdf and e-pub/ibook format covers the legal aspects of creating content for the web, and arms producers with the information they need to stay out of trouble and avoid costly legal issues.</p>
<p>More information at <a href="http://podcastlawbook.com">http://podcastlawbook.com</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<hr />
<h2>The Theatre Producer&#8217;s Legal and Business Field Guide</h2>
<p><a href="http://firemark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/theatrebook-3d.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1448 aligncenter" title="theatrebook-3d" src="http://firemark.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/theatrebook-3d.png" alt="" width="360" height="360" /></a>This book has been in the works for some time, and it&#8217;s nearly done.  I expect to release/launch this publication later this year.</p>
<p>Theatre Producing is a complex and challenging field, and The Theatre Producer&#8217;s Legal and Business Field Guide will arm  readers with the knowledge they need to successfully produce stage plays and musicals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2010/10/02/coming-soon-my-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast Episode 13</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2010/08/25/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2010/08/25/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=1375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Episode: Follow Ups:  Justin Bieber; Tenenbaum, Kate Plus 8 Fleeting Expletives JayZ wins A few Fair Use cases Copyrights, Trademark cases Some BIG wins for plaintiffs in profit participation suits. GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. SHOW NOTES FOLLOW UPS AND QUICK TAKES Justin Bieber’s use of Twitter has him in the news...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin: 0px 60px 100px 0px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Follow Ups:  Justin Bieber; Tenenbaum, Kate Plus 8</li>
<li>Fleeting Expletives</li>
<li>JayZ wins</li>
<li>A few Fair Use cases</li>
<li>Copyrights, Trademark cases</li>
<li>Some BIG wins for plaintiffs in profit participation suits.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: right;">
<p style="text-align: right;">
<p style="text-align: right;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p><span id="more-1375"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>SHOW NOTES</strong></p>
<p><strong>FOLLOW UPS AND QUICK TAKES</strong></p>
<p>Justin Bieber’s use of Twitter has him in the news again.</p>
<p><a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/206135/justin-biebers-evil-prank">theweek.com/article/index/206135/justin-biebers-evil-prank</a></p>
<p>Award of Statutory Damages reduced in Tanenbaum case</p>
<p><a href="http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2010/07/court-slashes-tenenbaum-award-by-90-on.html">Copyrights &amp; Campaigns: Court slashes Tenenbaum award by 90% on constitutional grounds</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2010/07/copyright_statu.htm">Copyright Statutory Damages Award Violates Constitutional Due Process&#8211;Sony v. Tenenbaum</a></p>
<p>Kate Plus 8 &#8211; issues around kids’ work permits</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2010/07/new-questions-about-legality-of-kate-plus-8-work-permits.html?DCMP=ESPcons_elegal&amp;&amp;&amp;">New Questions About Legality of &#8216;Kate Plus 8&#8242; Work Permits &#8211; Celebrity Parenting &#8211; Celebrity Justice</a></p>
<p><strong>REGULATORY</strong></p>
<p>FCC “fleeting expletives policy ruled unconstitutional</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thewrap.com/media/column-post/court-tosses-fccs-indecency-policy-first-amendment-violation-19182">Court Tosses FCC&#8217;s Indecency Policy | TheWrap.com</a><br />
<a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2010/07/second-circuit-strikes-down-fleeting-expletives-policy-on-constitutional-grounds.html">Second Circuit Strikes Down &#8220;Fleeting Expletives&#8221; Policy On Constitutional Grounds</a></p>
<p><a href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2010/07/13/second-circuit-strikes-down-fccs-fleeting-expletive-rule/">Second Circuit Strikes Down FCC’s “Fleeting Expletive” Rule « The Legal Satyricon</a></p>
<p><strong>COPYRIGHT</strong></p>
<p>JayZ  wins summary judgment against Egyptian plaintiff in song infringement suit.</p>
<p><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15494436310565587437&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholarr">Nafal v. Carter, 540 F. Supp. 2d 1128 &#8211; Dist. Court, CD California 2007 &#8211; Google Scholar</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202464024941&amp;Big_Pimpin_at_Ninth_Circuit_As_JayZ_Music_Publishers_Win_bAffirmation_of_Summary_Judgment">&#8220;Big Pimpin&#8221; at Ninth Circuit As Jay-Z, Music Publishers Win bAffirmation of Summary Judgment</a></p>
<p><strong>FAIR USE:</strong></p>
<p>More about the Jersey Boys<br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2e714761-1d9f-4836-a043-bfa3abbff21c&amp;utm_source=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Amec%20subscriber%20daily%20feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed%202010-08-02&amp;utm_term=">Sofa Entertainment, Inc. v. Dodger Productions, Inc</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=2e714761-1d9f-4836-a043-bfa3abbff21c&amp;utm_source=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Amec%20subscriber%20daily%20feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed%202010-08-02&amp;utm_term=">The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held that the display of a seven-second video clip from the Ed Sullivan Show during performances of the musical Jersey Boys was non-infringing fair use. </a></p>
<p>“Eli Stone” series not an infringement of books with character Ely Stone.<br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=48f8c689-3b29-4c72-8757-48211b56adc9&amp;utm_source=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology%20subscriber%20daily%20feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed%202010-08-10&amp;utm_term="> Davis v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=48f8c689-3b29-4c72-8757-48211b56adc9&amp;utm_source=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology%20subscriber%20daily%20feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed%202010-08-10&amp;utm_term=">Court holds that the author of two action-mystery books about a modern-day warrior and protector named Ely Stone failed to state a claim for copyright infringement against ABC, the producers of “Eli Stone,” a comedy-drama television series about an attorney named Eli Stone, finding that the common elements between the two works are not protectible </a></p>
<p><strong>Copyright Law &amp; preemption of contract claims</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=09e7e475-4b03-440c-bd70-f98b0eb28293&amp;utm_source=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology%20subscriber%20daily%20feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed%202010-07-09&amp;utm_term="> Stadt v. Fox News Network LLC</a><br />
In a case involving copyrighted video footage of Bernie Madoff, court holds that breach of contract claim based on alleged unauthorized use of an “exclusive” credit constituted an “extra element” such that the contract claim was not preempted by the Copyright Act</p>
<p>Are “beats” protectible under copyright law?<br />
<a href="http://uk.news.yahoo.com/1/20100807/ten-slim-thug-s-producer-sued-for-copyri-c60bd6d.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">Slim Thug&#8217;s producer sued for copyright infringement &#8211; Yahoo! News UK</a></p>
<p>Jerry Garcia’s publisher, family refuse licenses of Grateful Dead music for biopic.<br />
How do you make a movie about a musical artist, without using his music?<br />
<a href="http://www.spinner.com/2010/08/04/jerry-garcia-biopic-denied/">Jerry Garcia Biopic Denied Access to Grateful Dead Music &#8211; Spinner</a></p>
<p><strong>TRADEMARK  ??</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1532425.html?DCMP=NWL-pro_ip">Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Ent&#8217;mt., Inc. &#8211; US 9th Circuit</a><br />
Trial court judgment re: “Bratz”  ownership overturned on appeal</p>
<p><a href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/07/judge-shows-tlc-whos-the-real-cake-boss.html">Judge orders TLC to stop using &#8216;Cake Boss&#8217; title</a><br />
<a href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/07/judge-shows-tlc-whos-the-real-cake-boss.html">T</a>V show ordered to stop after complaint by maker of cake decorating software?  What about different classes of goods.  Doesn’t dilution require a VERY strong plaintiff’s mark?</p>
<p><a href="http://jetl.wordpress.com/2010/07/12/rachael-ray-wins-trademark-battle-over-her-name/">Rachael Ray Wins Trademark Battle Over Her Name </a></p>
<p><strong>JUST FOR FUN</strong> &#8211; Schuyler Moore’s guest post for Hollywood Reporter, Esq.</p>
<h4><a href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/07/do-you-know-your-showbiz-deal-terms.html"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Do you know your showbiz deal terms?</span></a></h4>
<p><strong>SOME IMPORTANT RECENT PROFIT PARTICIPATION / ACCOUNTING DECISIONS</strong></p>
<p>Alan Ladd Jr. wins big against WB over “Straightlining” in accounting for multiple films in bundled licenses.<br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ab5c37da-3d36-4256-b48e-2b12b60d6ea6">Ladd v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc</a><br />
<a href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/05/ladd-warner-bros-court-of-appeal.html">Warner Bros. loses Alan Ladd, Jr. appeal</a><br />
<a href="http://www.loeb.com/files/Publication/b7a57a63-6eff-4a4b-bb44-67b07cff39f9/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/f2548c22-5a60-4d1f-ace4-69e3ea2bbdb6/Ladd%20v%20Warner%20Bros%20Cal%20App%20Ct%20May%202010.pdf">Appellate court ruling in Ladd v. Warner Bros case (.pdf)</a><br />
<a href="http://calapp.blogspot.com/2010/05/ladd-v-warner-bros-entertainment-cal-ct.html">California Appellate Report: Ladd v. Warner Bros. Entertainment (Cal. Ct. App. &#8211; May 25, 2010)</a></p>
<p>Don Johnson wins big over Nash Bridges profits<br />
<a href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/07/nash-bridges-verdict-now-don-johnson-wins-big.html">&#8216;Nash Bridges&#8217; verdict! Now Don Johnson wins big!</a><br />
<a href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/07/trial-alert-how-much-is-don-johnson-owed-for-nash-bridges.html">Trial alert! How much is Don Johnson owed for &#8216;Nash Bridges&#8217;?</a><br />
<a href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/07/nash-bridges-verdict-now-don-johnson-wins-big.html"></a></p>
<p>“Whose lawyer Wants to be a Millionaire”<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/07/disneycelador-lawsuit-ver_n_638518.html">Disney-Celador Lawsuit Verdict: Disney Ordered To Pay &#8216;Millionaire&#8217; Makers $269.2 Million</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2010/08/25/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode013.mp3" length="100263382" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>In this Episode:   Follow Ups:  Justin Bieber; Tenenbaum, Kate Plus 8   Fleeting Expletives   JayZ wins   A few Fair Use cases   Copyrights, Trademark cases   Some BIG wins for plaintiffs in profit participation suits. - </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this Episode:


	Follow Ups:  Justin Bieber; Tenenbaum, Kate Plus 8
	Fleeting Expletives
	JayZ wins
	A few Fair Use cases
	Copyrights, Trademark cases
	Some BIG wins for plaintiffs in profit participation suits.



GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.

SHOW NOTES
FOLLOW UPS AND QUICK TAKES

Justin Bieber’s use of Twitter has him in the news again.

theweek.com/article/index/206135/justin-biebers-evil-prank

Award of Statutory Damages reduced in Tanenbaum case

Copyrights &amp; Campaigns: Court slashes Tenenbaum award by 90% on constitutional grounds

Copyright Statutory Damages Award Violates Constitutional Due Process--Sony v. Tenenbaum

Kate Plus 8 - issues around kids’ work permits

New Questions About Legality of &#039;Kate Plus 8&#039; Work Permits - Celebrity Parenting - Celebrity Justice

REGULATORY

FCC “fleeting expletives policy ruled unconstitutional

Court Tosses FCC&#039;s Indecency Policy | TheWrap.com
Second Circuit Strikes Down &quot;Fleeting Expletives&quot; Policy On Constitutional Grounds

Second Circuit Strikes Down FCC’s “Fleeting Expletive” Rule « The Legal Satyricon

COPYRIGHT

JayZ  wins summary judgment against Egyptian plaintiff in song infringement suit.

Nafal v. Carter, 540 F. Supp. 2d 1128 - Dist. Court, CD California 2007 - Google Scholar

&quot;Big Pimpin&quot; at Ninth Circuit As Jay-Z, Music Publishers Win bAffirmation of Summary Judgment

FAIR USE:

More about the Jersey Boys
Sofa Entertainment, Inc. v. Dodger Productions, Inc
The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held that the display of a seven-second video clip from the Ed Sullivan Show during performances of the musical Jersey Boys was non-infringing fair use. 

“Eli Stone” series not an infringement of books with character Ely Stone.
 Davis v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
Court holds that the author of two action-mystery books about a modern-day warrior and protector named Ely Stone failed to state a claim for copyright infringement against ABC, the producers of “Eli Stone,” a comedy-drama television series about an attorney named Eli Stone, finding that the common elements between the two works are not protectible 

Copyright Law &amp; preemption of contract claims

 Stadt v. Fox News Network LLC
In a case involving copyrighted video footage of Bernie Madoff, court holds that breach of contract claim based on alleged unauthorized use of an “exclusive” credit constituted an “extra element” such that the contract claim was not preempted by the Copyright Act

Are “beats” protectible under copyright law?
Slim Thug&#039;s producer sued for copyright infringement - Yahoo! News UK

Jerry Garcia’s publisher, family refuse licenses of Grateful Dead music for biopic.
How do you make a movie about a musical artist, without using his music?
Jerry Garcia Biopic Denied Access to Grateful Dead Music - Spinner

TRADEMARK  ??

Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Ent&#039;mt., Inc. - US 9th Circuit
Trial court judgment re: “Bratz”  ownership overturned on appeal

Judge orders TLC to stop using &#039;Cake Boss&#039; title
TV show ordered to stop after complaint by maker of cake decorating software?  What about different classes of goods.  Doesn’t dilution require a VERY strong plaintiff’s mark?

Rachael Ray Wins Trademark Battle Over Her Name 

JUST FOR FUN - Schuyler Moore’s guest post for Hollywood Reporter, Esq.
Do you know your showbiz deal terms?
SOME IMPORTANT RECENT PROFIT PARTICIPATION / ACCOUNTING DECISIONS

Alan Ladd Jr. wins big against WB over “Straightlining” in accounting for multiple films in bundled licenses.
Ladd v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc
Warner Bros. loses Alan Ladd, Jr. appeal
Appellate court ruling in Ladd v. Warner Bros case (.pdf)
California Appellate Report: Ladd v. Warner Bros. Entertainment (Cal. Ct. App. - May 25, 2010)

Don Johnson wins big over Nash Bridges profits
&#039;Nash Bridges&#039; verdict! Now Don Johnson wins big!
Trial alert!</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:31:11</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast: Entertainment Law Update &#8211; Episode 12 &#8211; YouTube, Hurt Locker, Idea Theft &amp; More</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2010/07/01/podcast-entertainment-law-update-episode-youtube-hurt-locker-idea-theft-more/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2010/07/01/podcast-entertainment-law-update-episode-youtube-hurt-locker-idea-theft-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=1269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Episode: Follow up on Hot News Viacom loses suit against YouTube. Hurt Locker Suit(s) Idea Theft Tribute Band Names Celebrity Rights of publicity GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Go to  Entertainment Law Update podcast page]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 0px 60px 140px 0px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Follow up on Hot News</li>
<li>Viacom loses suit against YouTube.</li>
<li>Hurt Locker Suit(s)</li>
<li>Idea Theft</li>
<li>Tribute Band Names</li>
<li>Celebrity Rights of publicity</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>Go to  <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com">Entertainment Law Update</a> podcast page</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2010/07/01/podcast-entertainment-law-update-episode-youtube-hurt-locker-idea-theft-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode012.mp3" length="71141600" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>In this Episode:   Follow up on Hot News   Viacom loses suit against YouTube.   Hurt Locker Suit(s)   Idea Theft   Tribute Band Names   Celebrity Rights of publicity - GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. - Go to  Entertainment Law Update podcast page</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this Episode:


	Follow up on Hot News
	Viacom loses suit against YouTube.
	Hurt Locker Suit(s)
	Idea Theft
	Tribute Band Names
	Celebrity Rights of publicity

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.

Go to  Entertainment Law Update podcast page</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>My appearance on This Week in Law!</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2009/10/09/guest-on-twil33/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2009/10/09/guest-on-twil33/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWIL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m honored to have been asked to join the panel of lawyers October 9th, for This Week in Law (TWIL) with Denise Howell.  This Week In Law is one of my favorite podcasts. I listen regularly, and look forward to being a part of it. The episode has now been published. Listen here: Download audio...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="TWIL logo" src="http://twit.tv/files/imagecache/coverart/coverart/podcast_18_3.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />I&#8217;m honored to have been asked to join the panel of lawyers October 9th, for This Week in Law (TWIL) with Denise Howell.  This Week In Law is one of my favorite podcasts.  I listen regularly, and look forward to being a part of it.</p>
<p>The episode has now been published.<br />
Listen here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/twit.cachefly.net/TWiL-033.mp3">Download audio file (TWiL-033.mp3)</a></p>
<p>Or visit &lt;a href=&#8221;http://twit.tv/twil33&gt;http://twit.tv/twil33 &lt;/a&gt;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">We&#8217;ll be streaming live  (with video) on the twit netcast network http://twitlive.tv, October 9th, from 11am to 1pm.  I hope you&#8217;ll join us.  It should be fun!</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">UPDATE:  What a fun time I had.  Here&#8217;s hoping I&#8217;m asked back again.  Thanks Denise!</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2009/10/09/guest-on-twil33/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/twit.cachefly.net/TWiL-033.mp3" length="54561167" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>podcast,Podcasting,TWIL</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>I&#039;m honored to have been asked to join the panel of lawyers October 9th, for This Week in Law (TWIL) with Denise Howell.  This Week In Law is one of my favorite podcasts.  I listen regularly, and look forward to being a part of it. - </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>I&#039;m honored to have been asked to join the panel of lawyers October 9th, for This Week in Law (TWIL) with Denise Howell.  This Week In Law is one of my favorite podcasts.  I listen regularly, and look forward to being a part of it.

The episode has now been published.
Listen here:



Or visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://twit.tv/twil33&gt;http://twit.tv/twil33 &lt;/a&gt;

We&#039;ll be streaming live  (with video) on the twit netcast network http://twitlive.tv, October 9th, from 11am to 1pm.  I hope you&#039;ll join us.  It should be fun!

UPDATE:  What a fun time I had.  Here&#039;s hoping I&#039;m asked back again.  Thanks Denise!</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>My guest appearance on Podcasters Emporium</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2009/09/27/my-guest-appearance-on-podcasters-emporium/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2009/09/27/my-guest-appearance-on-podcasters-emporium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PODCASTERS EMPORIUM #18Download audio file (podcastersemporium-episode18.mp3) I&#8217;m very flattered to have been asked to travel (sadly, only virtually) to Australia to  join James Williams and Dave Gray, the hosts of Australia&#8217;s &#8220;Podcasters Emporium&#8221; to talk about the legal ins and outs of podcasting.  Here&#8217;s a direct link to the episode:  http://shows.lifestylepodnetwork.info/podcastersemporium/2009/09/27/episode-18-legally-unblonde/ It was a blast...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><img class="size-full wp-image-719 alignright" title="emporium.art" src="http://firemark.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/emporium.art.png" alt="emporium.art" width="150" height="150" />PODCASTERS EMPORIUM #18</span><a href="http://podnetworkhosting.com/podcastersemporium/podcastersemporium-episode18.mp3">Download audio file (podcastersemporium-episode18.mp3)</a><br /></h3>
<p>I&#8217;m very flattered to have been asked to travel (sadly, only virtually) to Australia to  join James Williams and Dave Gray, the hosts of Australia&#8217;s <strong><a href="http://shows.lifestylepodnetwork.info/podcastersemporium" target="_blank">&#8220;Podcasters Emporium&#8221;</a></strong> to talk about the legal ins and outs of podcasting.  Here&#8217;s a direct link to the episode: <a href="http://shows.lifestylepodnetwork.info/podcastersemporium/2009/09/27/episode-18-legally-unblonde/" target="_blank"> http://shows.lifestylepodnetwork.info/podcastersemporium/2009/09/27/episode-18-legally-unblonde/</a> It was a blast talking to the guys, and I&#8217;m looking forward to joining them again!.  Thanks James and Dave!</p>
<p>Visit the links above, or just  listen here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2009/09/27/my-guest-appearance-on-podcasters-emporium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://podnetworkhosting.com/podcastersemporium/podcastersemporium-episode18.mp3" length="73455106" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>PODCASTERS EMPORIUM #18[audio:  http://podnetworkhosting.com/podcastersemporium/podcastersemporium-episode18.mp3] I&#039;m very flattered to have been asked to travel (sadly, only virtually) to Australia to  join James Williams and Dave Gray,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>PODCASTERS EMPORIUM #18[audio:  http://podnetworkhosting.com/podcastersemporium/podcastersemporium-episode18.mp3]
I&#039;m very flattered to have been asked to travel (sadly, only virtually) to Australia to  join James Williams and Dave Gray, the hosts of Australia&#039;s &quot;Podcasters Emporium&quot; to talk about the legal ins and outs of podcasting.  Here&#039;s a direct link to the episode:  http://shows.lifestylepodnetwork.info/podcastersemporium/2009/09/27/episode-18-legally-unblonde/ It was a blast talking to the guys, and I&#039;m looking forward to joining them again!.  Thanks James and Dave!

Visit the links above, or just  listen here!</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update &#8211; Episode 3 &#8211; Bloggers, Journalism &amp; Defamation</title>
		<link>http://firemark.com/2009/07/14/entertainment-law-update-episode-bloggers-journalism-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://firemark.com/2009/07/14/entertainment-law-update-episode-bloggers-journalism-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firemark.com/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Episode 3 of the Entertainment Law Update podcast is now available at http://entertainmentlawupdate.com Download audio file (EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode3.mp3) Download Episode (right click) Approximate Running Time: 1:06 SHOW NOTES can be found at http://entertainmentlawupdate.com In this episode: MCLE Approval &#8211; California Approved Episode 1, pending on 2 and 3. Once we&#8217;ve got 4 under our belt, we...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Episode 3 of the  Entertainment Law Update podcast is now available at http://entertainmentlawupdate.com</p>
<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-29 alignleft" style="margin-left: 6px; margin-right: 6px;" title="podcast-logo.jpg" src="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/podcast-logo-150x150.jpg" alt="podcast-logo.jpg" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate//EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode3.mp3">Download audio file (EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode3.mp3)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode3.mp3">Download Episode (right click)</a></p>
<p>Approximate Running Time: 1:06</p>
<hr />
<h2 style="text-align: center;">SHOW NOTES can be found at <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com" target="_blank">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com</a></h2>
<p><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com" target="_blank"></a><span id="more-456"></span></p>
<p>In this episode:</p>
<div>
<ul>
<li>MCLE Approval &#8211; California Approved Episode 1, pending on 2 and 3.  Once we&#8217;ve got 4 under our belt, we can apply to be approved as a provider, and the process will be a lot easier.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to <a href="http://sakucollins.com/" target="_blank">Mark Saku</a>, an IP attorney in Seattle  for his help investigating CLE approval process in  Washington, Oregon &amp; Idaho.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">LEGISLATION/RULEMAKING/ADMINISTRATIVE</div>
<p>Copyright Fees are increasing effective August 1, 2009</p>
<div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/docs/fees.html" target="_blank">http://www.copyright.gov/docs/fees.html</a></li>
</ul>
<div><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/docs/fees.html"></a>Pandora Web Radio reaches a settlement on music royalty rates.</div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2009/07/pandora-agrees-to-new-royalty-plan-will-start-char.html" target="_blank">http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2009/07/pandora-agrees-to-new-royalty-plan-will-start-char.html</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/technology/2009/7/10/riaa_negotiates_rates_with_pandora_online.htm">http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/technology/2009/7/10/riaa_negotiates_rates_with_pandora_online.htm</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309421/pandora-agreement-saves-internet-radio">http://gizmodo.com/5309421/pandora-agreement-saves-internet-radio</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/internet-radio-saved-at-a-small-cost?siteid=nwhpm">http://www.marketwatch.com/story/internet-radio-saved-at-a-small-cost?siteid=nwhpm</a></li>
</ul>
<div>ASCAP wants to be paid when your phone rings</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/ascap-wants-be-paid-">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/ascap-wants-be-paid-</a></li>
<li><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InPropriaPersona/~3/XzhJ0lIJCWM/">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InPropriaPersona/~3/XzhJ0lIJCWM/</a></li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: center;">CASES</div>
<p>Jammie Thomas &#8211; Rassett loses file sharing suit brought by RIAA &#8211; $1.9 Million Verdict!<br />
Capitol v. Thomas, No. 06-1497 (D. Minn., 2009)</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_v._Thomas">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_v._Thomas</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/06/riaa-jury-slaps-2-million-fine-on-jammie-thomas/">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/06/riaa-jury-slaps-2-million-fine-on-jammie-thomas/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10268199-93.html">http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10268199-93.html</a></li>
<li><a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/#1573024392128294747"> Comprehensive List of Links to Commentary</a></li>
<li><a href="http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Documents.htm&amp;s=Virgin_v_Thomas">Comprehensive List of Court Docs</a></li>
</ul>
<div>JD Salinger prevents publication of new book<br />
Salinger v. Colting, No. 09-50905 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) <a href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=186f446d-33f3-4e74-adad-0650f7860395" target="_blank">Order</a></div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/blog/post/A-Sequel-to-Catcher-In-The-Rye.aspx   " target="_blank">http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/blog/post/A-Sequel-to-Catcher-In-The-Rye.aspx</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/blog/post/Chapter-Two--No-Sequel-To-Catcher-In-The-Rye-In-The-US.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/blog/post/Chapter-Two&#8211;No-Sequel-To-Catcher-In-The-Rye-In-The-US.aspx</a></li>
<li><a href="http://entertainmentagentblog.com/2009/06/30/catcher-and-the-lye/" target="_self">http://entertainmentagentblog.com/2009/06/30/catcher-and-the-lye/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/Ei1C17yNSAk/">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/Ei1C17yNSAk/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.1010wins.com/pages/4512245.php?contentType=4">http://www.1010wins.com/pages/4512245.php?contentType=4&amp;contentId=4099583</a></li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: center;">YOUTUBE CASE OF THE MONTH</div>
<p>Google Class Action:  No foreign plaintiffs without US Copyright registrations may be part of the class. (The Football Assn. Premier League v. YouTube)</p></div>
<div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.youtubeclassaction.com/">http://www.youtubeclassaction.com/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtubeclassaction.com/">http://www.youtubeclassaction.com/</a></li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: center;">TENENBAUM LITIGATION</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">(THE CIRCUS CONTINUES)</div>
<ul>
<li>Labels have made Motion for Summary Judgment re Tenenbaum;s fair use defense.
<ul>
<li><a href="http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/06/tenenbaum-court-dismisses-counterclaims.html" target="_blank"> http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/06/tenenbaum-court-dismisses-counterclaims.html</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Counterclaims re Abuse of Process &#8211; Dismissed, Motion to join RIAA &#8211; denied, Questions unconstitutionality of Statutory Damages &#8211; deferred
<ul>
<li><a href="http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/06/tenenbaum-court-dismisses-counterclaims.html">http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/06/tenenbaum-court-dismisses-counterclaims.html</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Tenenbaum&#8217;s attorney in the crosshairs.
<ul>
<li><a href="http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/07/labels-reply-to-nesson-on-recordings.html">http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/07/labels-reply-to-nesson-on-recordings.html</a></li>
<li><a href="http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/07/nesson-responds-to-osc-re-taping-claims.html">http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/07/nesson-responds-to-osc-re-taping-claims.html</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Some other links about the Tenenbaum case: <a href="http://www.entmedialaw.com/?query=tenenbaum">http://www.entmedialaw.com/?query=tenenbaum</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;">FAIR USE CORNER</div>
<div>Does an Anti-Plagiarism Service Violate Students&#8217; Copyrights when it maintains a database (i.e., copies) of  student papers?</div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.theiplawblog.com/archives/-copyright-law-does-an-antiplagiarism-service-violate-students-copyrights.html">http://www.theiplawblog.com/archives/-copyright-law-does-an-antiplagiarism-service-violate-students-copyrights.html</a></li>
</ul>
<div>Supreme Court Denies Cert in Cablevision online DVR case.</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">NOVELTY CASE OF THE MONTH</div>
<div>Man sues over use of canned music in British production of a musical&#8230; and wins!   (UK  case)</div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/richard_morrison/article6661672.ece?openComment=true">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/richard_morrison/article6661672.ece?openComment=true</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Lindt Chocolate Bunny trademark dispute? (Belgium? Switzerland? EU?)</p>
<div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://jetl.wordpress.com/2009/06/15/lindt-defends-chocolate-bunny/">http://jetl.wordpress.com/2009/06/15/lindt-defends-chocolate-bunny/</a></li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p><em>Yes, Lindt does have a US trademark registration for “Chocolate, chocolate products, namely, a chocolate bunny in a foil wrapper.”</em></p>
<p><em>Link to screen shot from pto<a href=" http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3d26257d-7d8d-46d3-bb2a-4189816626c3" target="_blank"> http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3d26257d-7d8d-46d3-bb2a-4189816626c3</a></em></p>
<p><em>The application was based upon a priority filing date from a foreign application.  The US application was initially refused with the examining attorney claiming the proposed mark comprises a configuration of the goods that is not inherently distinctive and would not be perceived as a mark.  The refusal was overcome by filing a distinctiveness claim (provision 2(f)) based on continuous use of over 5 years and a claim in an earlier filed US trademark application.  The question remains, if the EU registration is cancelled, could the US registration be cancelled because of the priority claim relating to the EU registration, or would the US registration be amended to show a later date of first use?</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><em><br />
</em></p></blockquote>
<div>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 104px"><a href="defamationlawblog.com"><img title="Adrianos Fachetti - California Defamation Attorney" src="http://www.defamationlawblog.com/uploads/image/Europe%2007%20031_2(1).jpg" alt="Guest:  Adrianos Facheti, Esq." width="94" height="134" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Guest:  Adrianos Facheti, Esq.</p></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">DEFAMATION</div>
<div>GUEST &#8211; Adrianos Fachetti, Internet Defamation Law Blog <a href="http://www.defamationlawblog.com/">http://www.defamationlawblog.com/</a></div>
<ul>
<li> New Jersey Court rules Blogger is not a journalist and not subject to reporter&#8217;s privilege or shield law
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2009/07/new-jersey-judge-rules-blogger-cannot-claim-protection-of-shield-law.html">http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2009/07/new-jersey-judge-rules-blogger-cannot-claim-protection-of-shield-law.html</a></li>
<li>Where&#8217;s the line between journalist and citizen-on-a-soapbox?</li>
<li>Is a blogger a &#8220;media defendant&#8221;?</li>
<li>Does NY Times v. Sullivan elevated standard of &#8220;Actual Malice&#8221; apply?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>By Contrast, California courts have held that Bloggers ARE journalists:
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.mediabloggers.org/california-courts-rule-bloggers-are-journalists">http://www.mediabloggers.org/california-courts-rule-bloggers-are-journalists</a></li>
<li>Apple Barred From Obtaining Source Of Blog&#8217;s Article &#8211;   <a href="http://www.internetlibrary.com/cases/lib_case430.cfm">O&#8217;Grady v. Superior Court</a> &#8211; 139 Cal. App. 4th 1423, 2006 WL 1452685 (Cal. App. , 6th Dist., May 26, 2006)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Sarah Palin resigns, attorney threatens media, bloggers, etc.  (<a href="http://www.defamationlawblog.com/2009/07/articles/defamation-basics/palins-defamation-claim-and-the-sad-state-of-reporting-in-america-today/">Adrianos&#8217; Blog post commenting on state of journalism)</a>
<ul>
<li>Would she have a claim?  Public Figure?  Couched as opinion?  Reporting on the fact of rumors?</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://firemark.com/2009/07/14/entertainment-law-update-episode-bloggers-journalism-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode3.mp3" length="80131396" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Episode 3 of the  Entertainment Law Update podcast is now available at http://entertainmentlawupdate.com - [audio: EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode3.mp3] - Download Episode (right click) - Approximate Running Time: 1:06 </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Episode 3 of the  Entertainment Law Update podcast is now available at http://entertainmentlawupdate.com



[audio: EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode3.mp3]

Download Episode (right click)

Approximate Running Time: 1:06


SHOW NOTES can be found at http://entertainmentlawupdate.com


In this episode:


	MCLE Approval - California Approved Episode 1, pending on 2 and 3.  Once we&#039;ve got 4 under our belt, we can apply to be approved as a provider, and the process will be a lot easier.




	Thanks to Mark Saku, an IP attorney in Seattle  for his help investigating CLE approval process in  Washington, Oregon &amp; Idaho.


LEGISLATION/RULEMAKING/ADMINISTRATIVE
Copyright Fees are increasing effective August 1, 2009


	http://www.copyright.gov/docs/fees.html

Pandora Web Radio reaches a settlement on music royalty rates.

	http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2009/07/pandora-agrees-to-new-royalty-plan-will-start-char.html
	http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/technology/2009/7/10/riaa_negotiates_rates_with_pandora_online.htm
	http://gizmodo.com/5309421/pandora-agreement-saves-internet-radio
	http://www.marketwatch.com/story/internet-radio-saved-at-a-small-cost?siteid=nwhpm

ASCAP wants to be paid when your phone rings


	 http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/ascap-wants-be-paid-
	http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InPropriaPersona/~3/XzhJ0lIJCWM/

CASES
Jammie Thomas - Rassett loses file sharing suit brought by RIAA - $1.9 Million Verdict!
Capitol v. Thomas, No. 06-1497 (D. Minn., 2009)

	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_v._Thomas
	http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/06/riaa-jury-slaps-2-million-fine-on-jammie-thomas/
	http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10268199-93.html
	 Comprehensive List of Links to Commentary
	Comprehensive List of Court Docs

JD Salinger prevents publication of new book
Salinger v. Colting, No. 09-50905 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) Order

	http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/blog/post/A-Sequel-to-Catcher-In-The-Rye.aspx
	http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/blog/post/Chapter-Two--No-Sequel-To-Catcher-In-The-Rye-In-The-US.aspx
	http://entertainmentagentblog.com/2009/06/30/catcher-and-the-lye/
	http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/Ei1C17yNSAk/
	http://www.1010wins.com/pages/4512245.php?contentType=4&amp;contentId=4099583

YOUTUBE CASE OF THE MONTH
Google Class Action:  No foreign plaintiffs without US Copyright registrations may be part of the class. (The Football Assn. Premier League v. YouTube)


	http://www.youtubeclassaction.com/
	http://www.youtubeclassaction.com/

TENENBAUM LITIGATION
(THE CIRCUS CONTINUES)

	Labels have made Motion for Summary Judgment re Tenenbaum;s fair use defense.

	 http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/06/tenenbaum-court-dismisses-counterclaims.html


	Counterclaims re Abuse of Process - Dismissed, Motion to join RIAA - denied, Questions unconstitutionality of Statutory Damages - deferred

	http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/06/tenenbaum-court-dismisses-counterclaims.html




	Tenenbaum&#039;s attorney in the crosshairs.

	http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/07/labels-reply-to-nesson-on-recordings.html
	http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/07/nesson-responds-to-osc-re-taping-claims.html


	Some other links about the Tenenbaum case: http://www.entmedialaw.com/?query=tenenbaum



FAIR USE CORNER
Does an Anti-Plagiarism Service Violate Students&#039; Copyrights when it maintains a database (i.e., copies) of  student papers?

	http://www.theiplawblog.com/archives/-copyright-law-does-an-antiplagiarism-service-violate-students-copyrights.html

Supreme Court Denies Cert in Cablevision online DVR case.
NOVELTY CASE OF THE MONTH
Man sues over use of canned music in British production of a musical... and wins!   (UK  case)

	http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/richard_morrison/article6661672.ece?openComment=true

Lindt Chocolate Bunny trademark dispute? (Belgium?</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

