Monthly Archives: October 2013

Entertainment Law Update Podcast Episode 045

podcast-logo

Play

In this episode of Entertainment Law Update, Entertainment lawyers Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennet review the latest cases and controversies in the entertainment industry.

 

 

Clio - Online Practice Management done right.Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]” Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio

Show Notes

Continue Reading

Asked & Answered: should I register multiple copyrights together!.

Asked & Answered: should I register multiple copyrights together!.

3d figure question mark

Q:


Angel asks about registering his multiple copyrights under a single folio of works.

This video provides my answer:

AUDIO:

Play

TRANSCRIPT:

A:

 

The short answer is yes, it's often possible to register multiple works together as a folio. But, it's not always a very good idea.

Some recent court rulings seem to suggest that when multiple works within a folio are infringed, the plaintiff may only recover one award of damages. Also, if it work isn't registered within three months of its original publication, The plaintiff will not be entitled to recover attorneys fees, nor collect statutory damages. So, registering your works as a group could really be shooting oneself in the foot.

Alert for Reality TV producers.  Filming or photographing celebrities’ kids will soon be a crime.

Alert for Reality TV producers. Filming or photographing celebrities’ kids will soon be a crime.

Should celebrities' kids be off-limits for photographers and video crews?

California's new law.

A California law set to go into effect next January makes it a criminal offense to take photographs or videographic images of a star's child under some circumstances. The new law is codified at Section 11414 of California's Penal Code, and imposes fines and even imprisonment as penalties.

Jail Time?!

First offenders face a maximum $10,000 fine, plus jail time. A second violation carries a five-day jail sentence and a maximum $20,000 fine. A third offense? 30-days in the clink, and $30,000 fine. And, the law creates civil liability, too. A lawsuit by the parent or guardian could include punitive damages.

State Sen. Kevin de Leon introduced the bill, which provides strong protection for minors under age 16 who are children of celebrities are protected against individuals who intentionally harass a person's child “because of that person's employment.” The law defines harassment as intentional conduct that “seriously alarms, annoys, torments or terrorizes” the minor and “serves no legitimate purpose.” Encompassed within the definition is “conduct occurring during the course of any actual or attempted recording” of the child's image or voice by following the youth without parental permission.

But is it constitutional?

Media and Free Speech advocates have raised concerns that the new law is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, and is likely to catch too many people engaged in protected newsgathering activities in its net. The law, apparently, even applies to shooting in public places, where neither celebrities nor their kids have historically been entitled to a ‘reasonable expectation of privacy'. Finally, we should note that the law does NOT apply to photographers who harass, alarm, annoy, etc., kids whose parents aren't famous. Did California lawmakers really just legally define celebrity kids as a different class of citizens with broader rights than the rest?

Guidelines for reality tv and newsgathering folks. (and average citizens with camera phones, for that matter)

Bottom line: If you're in the Reality TV productoin biz, and a celebrity with kids arrives in your shot, you'd have to stop shooting, or risk being charged with violating the statute. And, are you just supposed to know that that kid walking down the street happens to be the son or daughter of someone famous? Better give your camera crews some clear guidelines, and the phone number of a criminal defense attorney who's ready to fight on this issue. (if you need one, contact me for a referral)

Obviously, the law was created to address a problem. Celebrities' kids are being deprived of the opportunities other kids have to just be kids. But this law strikes me as being a bad one. Freedom of the press is among our most important rights. Attempts to curb press and media activities should always be suspect.

I'd be surprised if the media rights organizations don't jump on this one quickly, the first time the law is enforced. Until then… we'll watch and see.

What do you think about all this? Leave a comment below!

There is no custom code to display.

Find us on Google+